Legal Opinion

Moore v. Leonard

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1999No. 98-2631PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals for the reasons stated in its judgment entry. Parole may be revoked even though criminal charges based on the same facts are dismissed, the defendant is acquitted, or the conviction is overturned, unless all factual support for the revocation is removed. State ex rel. Carrion v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. (1998), 80 Ohio St.3d 637, 638, 687 N.E.2d 759, 760. In order to avoid dismissal of an improper-revocation claim based on the foregoing exception, an inmate must plead specific facts to show how dismissal of the criminal charges removed all factual…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hickman v. CapotsOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State ex rel. Carrion v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Barnett v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Duganitz v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Ridenour v. RandleOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Ridenour v. RandleOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Duganitz v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Reyes v. TateOhio Supreme Court · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API