Legal Opinion

Ridenour v. Randle

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 2002No. 2002-0154PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 96 Ohio St.3d 90.] RIDENOUR, APPELLANT, v. RANDLE, WARDEN, APPELLEE. [Cite as Ridenour v. Randle,

2002-Ohio-3606.] Habeas corpus sought to compel relator’s release from prison on parole—Court of appeals’ denial of writ affirmed, when—Testing constitutionality of parole eligibility requirements not cognizable in state habeas corpus— Alleged breach of plea agreement not timely raised. (No. 2002-0154—Submitted June 26, 2002—Decided July 31, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Ross County, No. 01CA2589. __________________ Per…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Seikbert v. WilkinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Gaskins v. ShiplevyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Tran v. McGrathOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Heddleston v. MackOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State ex rel. Lanham v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. GambleOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  2. McDonald v. StuffOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
  3. Cotton v. AndersonOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. State v. Eberlin, 07 Be 51 (6-18-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Bell v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Claims · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API