Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Dysart

District Court, Virgin Islands

Decided December 1, 2008No. Civil No. 2007-116PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GÓMEZ, Chief Judge

MEMORANDUM OPINION

(December 1, 2008)

Before the Court is the motion of the defendant Robert L. Dysart (“Dysart”) to transfer this matter to the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). For the reasons stated below, the Court will deny the motion.

*813I. FACTS

In 1990, Dysart obtained a disability insurance policy from Lincoln National Life Insurance Company (“Lincoln”). At the time he obtained the insurance, Dysart was a senior partner at a “boutique” insurance and tort litigation firm in Phoenix, Arizona.

In 1997, Dysart filed a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. George Jumara and Evangelina Jumara, H/w v. State Farm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  4. Shutte v. Armco Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  5. Ferens v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Borghi v. Purple Group, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 2009
  2. Xinuos, Inc. v. International Business Machines CorporationDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2022
  3. Xinuos, Inc. v. International Business Machines CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API