Legal Opinion

Craft v. Pace of South Holland

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 8, 1992No. 87 C 3569Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

LINDBERG, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Dwayne Craft (“Craft”), commenced this civil rights action against defendant, Pace South Division (“Pace”), improperly sued as Pace of South Holland. Plaintiff contends that Transit - Management of Harvey, Inc. (“TMOH”), the predecessor of Pace, violated his Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights against unreasonable search and seizure and his right to privacy under Article I, Section 6 of the Illinois Constitution, when its managerial agents ordered him to provide blood and urine samples for drug and alcohol testing. Plaintiff was…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API