Legal Opinion
Drayton v. McCall
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided January 27, 1978No. Civ. B-77-424PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
DALY, District Judge.
The issue in this habeas corpus action is the continued validity of the District of Connecticut rule mandating that the United States Parole Commission (the Commission) provide the due process safeguards of Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 92 S.Ct. 2593, 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972), and Gag-non v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778, 93 S.Ct. 1756, 36 L.Ed.2d 656 (1973), in parole rescission hearings. This rule, originally established in Williams v. U. S. Board of Parole, 383 F.Supp. 402 (D.Conn.1974), was later reaffirmed in light of Woff v. McDonneli, 418 U.S.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Drayton v. MccallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Drayton v. McCallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Green v. McCallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Green v. MccallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Green v. McCallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.