Drayton v. McCall
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OAKES, Circuit Judge:
This appeal presents the questions whether the Due Process clause mandates procedural safeguards before the United States Parole Commission may rescind a prior grant of parole to begin in futuro and, if so, the extent of the safeguards mandated. The United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, T. F. Gilroy Daly, Judge, held that the procedures specified in Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 487-90, 92 S.Ct. 2593, 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972), and Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778, 790-91, 93 S.Ct. 1756, 36 L.Ed.2d 656 (1973), are similarly required in parole…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Tasker v. MohnWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
- Jackson v. JohnsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Drayton v. MccallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Hearn v. NelsonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1980
- United States of America Ex Rel. Curtis Houston v. Warden, Stateville Correctional Center, and Illinois Prisoner Review BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.