Legal Opinion

State v. Beane

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 30, 2013No. A12-2222PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SMITH, Judge.

We affirm appellant’s count-one, first-degree-burglary and count-three, domestic-abuse convictions because (1) the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting relationship evidence, (2) the district court did not err in its other rulings, and (3) sufficient evidence supports the convictions. We reverse appellant’s count-two, first-degree-burglary conviction because one entry of an apartment without consent, followed by multiple assaults committed while in the apartment, supports only one first-degree burglary conviction. We remand for resentencing with…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Roby v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  2. Dukes v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  3. State v. BuchananSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. State v. McCoySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  5. State v. BartyllaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  2. State of Minnesota v. Keith DawsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API