Hollman v. Hollman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BURROUGHS, J., pro tem.
-This is an action upon a promissory note. Plaintiff recovered a judgment in the sum of $8,500 with also an attorney fee of $500. From said judgment the defendant appeals.
It is appellant’s contention that he was entitled to a credit on said promissory note of $5,350 which the court failed to give him. This claim depends upon the construction of a certain contract entered into by the parties hereto under the following circumstances:
Plaintiff and defendant were husband and wife. July 14, 1921, they entered into an agreement for the purpose of settling and determining…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United Iron Works v. Outer Harbor Dock & Wharf Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Provident Gold Mining Co. v. Manhattan SEC. Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Thompson v. Southern Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Alabama · 1902
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hamilton v. HollmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929