Legal Opinion

Mower County Human Services Ex Rel. Swancutt v. Swancutt

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 11, 1996No. C4-95-863PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STRINGER, Justice.

Here we are asked to determine whether a contempt order to enforce a child support order may contain a continuing purge obligation such that, to avoid jail time, the delinquent parent must meet future support obligations until the year 2009, the time when the youngest child reaches age 18. We conclude that the trial court was within its discretion to order continuing compliance with a child support order as a purging condition of a stayed contempt sentence.

Since 1988, respondent Mark A. Swancutt has provided little financial support for his three children in spite of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. FeiockSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Hopp v. HoppSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  5. Marriage of Erickson v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re the Welfare of J.B.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. JAKE'S, LTD., INC. RICHARD J. JACOBSON, — v. CITY OF COATES, —Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  3. L & D Trucking v. Minnesota Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  4. Ramsey County v. CrockarellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  5. In re the Marriage of: Tamara Eileen Goemaat v. Andrew Joel GoemaatCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API