Legal Opinion

United States v. Edward Dominguez

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 4, 2004No. 02-2081PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOGGS, Chief Judge.

The United States appeals from an interlocutory order in its prosecution against Edward Dominguez. The district court suppressed key evidence on the basis of issue preclusion because the same evidence had been suppressed in a previous Michigan state court proceeding against Dominguez. Because the district court misinterpreted applicable Michigan law, we REVERSE this order and remand for further proceedings consistent with our holdings.

I

This case presents the interesting issue of what preclusive force a Michigan state criminal proceeding may have upon the course of a…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Chris Davis v. James GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  2. Southfield Education Ass'n v. Southfield Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  3. Rourke v. Amchem Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  4. James v. Heritage Valley Federal Credit UnionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. Robert Archibald, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API