KATHERINE JANE SOUZA v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.
Appellant challenges the facial constitutionality of Section 948.06(8)(e)2., Florida Statutes (2016), as violative of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 630 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), to the extent that it directs a judge, rather than a jury, to make a factual finding of dangerousness, which she .contends increases the minimum penalty for a crime. Because the right to trial by jury is not required in a revocation proceeding, and the court’s finding that the probationer is a danger to the community only prevents the court from again allowing probation, we hold that the statute is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Roberts v. CochranSupreme Court of Florida · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- JERMAINE CLARINGTON v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020
- JONATHAN D. BORRERO v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020
- MICHELLE A HOLLINGSWORTH v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020