Legal Opinion
Rouse v. H.B. Fuller Company
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided October 10, 2025No. 0:22-cv-02173Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Lisa Rouse, Juston Rouse, Jenna Drouin, Case No. 22-CV-02173 (JMB/JFD) and Nicholas Drouin, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, ORDER v. H.B. Fuller Company and H.B. Fuller Construction Products Inc., Defendants. This matter is before the Court on non-party TEC Specialty, LLC’s (“TEC Specialty”) Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs (Dkt. No. 564) made pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45(d)(1). The fees and costs TEC Specialty requests are connected to subpoenas served on it and its parent company,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lamb Engineering & Construction Company v. Nebraska Public Power DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Fair Isaac Corp. v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Bergstrom v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1982
- United States v. Gonzalez-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.