Legal Opinion

Bergstrom v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided February 25, 1982No. Civ. 3-75-248PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM INCORPORATING FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER FOR JUDGMENT

MacLAUGHLIN, District Judge.

This action for patent infringement is before the Court for the third time. The matter first came before the Court for a determination of the issue of whether the patent involved, United States Design Patent No. 228,728, was invalid pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 102(b). The Court held that the patent was not invalid and dismissed the defendants’ counterclaim for declaratory judgment of invalidity. Bergstrom v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 457 F.Supp. 213 (D.Minn.1978), aff’d, 599 F.2d 62 (8th…

2Cases cited17 opinions

D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
The Aro Corporation v. Allied Witan CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
Louis E. FULGENCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. RAY McDERMOTT & CO., Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
Kukla v. National Distillers Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
Massachusetts Casualty Insurance Company v. Kenneth B. FormanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

Lester J. Trnka v. Elanco Products Co., a Division of Eli Lilly and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
Keithley Edwards v. Born, Inc. Appeal of Keithley Edwards and Edith EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
Pinkham v. Sara Lee Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
Morris G. WORTHY, Appellant, v. McKesson CORPORATION D/B/A Peter Hauptmann Company, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
Capital Dredge and Dock Corporation, an Ohio Corporation v. City of Detroit, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.