Bailey v. Rutledge
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Cureton, Judge:
In this zoning appeal, the circuit court reversed a decision of the Board of Adjustment of the City of Seneca which denied respondent William J. Bailey’s request for a variance to the City’s zoning ordinance to permit an addition to his child care facility. We reverse.
In 1978, a child care center was established on the lot involved in this appeal. Effective January 1,1984, the City of Seneca revised its zoning ordinance so that the day care center was placed in a R-15 (one-family residential) zone. Child care centers are not permitted in R-15 zones; however, the ordinance…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- James v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
- Conway v. CITY OF GREENVILLE, SCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
- City Ice Delivery Co. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974
- Bouchette ex rel. Bouchette v. International Ladies Garment Worker's UnionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
- Christy v. HarlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gurganious v. City of BeaufortCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
- Heilker v. Zoning Board of AppealsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
- Vulcan Materials Co. v. Greenville County Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
- Fairfield Ocean Ridge, Inc. v. Town of Edisto BeachCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
- City of Myrtle Beach v. Juel P. Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.