Legal Opinion

City of California v. Howard

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 15, 1883PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Moniteau Circuit Court. — Hon. E. L. Edwards, Judge. j The following was the plat offered in evidence.

1Opinion of the CourtHough, C. J.

This is an action of ejectment to recover possession of a certain parcel of ground lying within the corporate limits of the city of California, and claimed by the city to have been dedicated by the owners thereof to public use.

l. dedication TO public use. It appears from a plat offered in evidence, the original of which was duly deposited with the recorder of the county in 1854> by tlie defendant and one Smith, that an addition to the then “ town of California ” was laid out on ground lying on both sides of the track of the Pacific railroad, which, at this point runs nearly east and west,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Hannibal v. DraperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1852

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Neil v. Independent Realty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  2. Downend v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  3. Buschmann v. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  4. Union Elevator Co. v. Kansas City Suburban Belt RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  5. City of Caruthersville v. CantrellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API