Legal Opinion

Fraley v. Worthington

District Court, D. Wyoming

Decided November 27, 1974No. C74-68PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KERR, District Judge.

The question for decision in this matter is whether the defendant as a tool pusher, i. e., general foreman for the employer, owed the plaintiff a duty to provide a safe place to work and whether, by his negligence, if any, the defendant breached that duty? Defendant has filed a motion for summary judgment supported by affidavits asserting that no genuine issue as to any material fact exists. Plaintiff has filed counter-affidavits in opposition to the motion.

The use of summary judgment to achieve expeditious disposition of cases is a cardinal virtue but…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  2. Ransom v. HanerAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Broderick Wood Products Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  4. Markle v. WilliamsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Baldwin v. ByrneWyoming Supreme Court · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Case v. GossWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Athas v. HillCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  3. Abeyta v. HensleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Abeyta v. HensleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Case v. GossWyoming Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API