Potter v. Glassell
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Appeal from First Judicial District Court, Parish of Caddo; T. F. Bell, Judge. Action by Harold C. Potter against John Glassell. From a judgment for only part of the relief demanded, plaintiff appeals, and defendant praj^s that plaintiff’s demands be rejected in toto.
1Opinion of the CourtDawkins, J.
Plaintiff claims the sum of $12,347 as damages for personal injuries, etc., alleged to have been occasioned by a collision of his motorcycle with the automobile of the defendant.
Defendant excepted to the petition on the ground of vagueness, and plaintiff was ordered to amend, which was accordingly done, and thereupon an exception of no cause of action was filed and subsequently overruled. Answer was then filed admitting some of the allegations, including article 3, which, in the original petition, alleged indebtedness in the amount above stated; but we assume that this admission was made…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Schick v. JeneveinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
3Cited by19 opinions
- Lacy v. LuckyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
- Goff v. Sinclair Refining Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
- Sears v. Interurban Transp. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
- Goodson v. Schuster's Wholesale Produce Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Teche Lines, Inc. v. GorumSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.