Legal Opinion
Stavola v. Northeast Utilities
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided October 3, 2006No. 3:05cv998 (JBA)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
PHASE 1 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
ARTERTON, District Judge.
Because there are two potentially dis-positive factual issues in this ERISA case, the Court and the parties agreed that an evidentiary hearing (Phase 1) would be held in lieu of summary judgment motion practice as the more expeditious course. What follows are the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law on these two issues, related to statute of limitations and the sufficiency of plaintiffs inquiry to trigger defendants’ informational response duty.
I. Introduction
Plaintiff Jean A. Stavola (“Stavola”) is a former…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anthony R. Caputo David A. Cook Paul B. Pebbles Duncan B. Robertson v. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- James F. Mullins v. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Anthony J. Pocchia v. Nynex Corporation and Nynex Service CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Ballone v. Eastman Kodak Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Hudson v. General Dynamics Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Luck v. McMahonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021