United States v. Fimmano
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
PERRY, Judge: *
In this case, we examine the requirement contained in the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution that “no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation . . .” (emphasis supplied) and its applicability to searches and seizures in the military services. This Court has previously held that information *198presented to the official who authorizes searches and seizures need not be under oath or affirmation. United States v. Penman, 16 U.S.C.M.A. 67, 36 C.M.R. 223 (1966); United States v. Hartsook, 15 U.S. C.M.A. 291, 35 C.M.R. 263…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. StuckeyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
- United States v. RushingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
- United States v. LandUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
- United States v. FoustUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. PowellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.