Legal Opinion

United States v. Fimmano

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided January 21, 1980No. 35,152; CM 433848PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

PERRY, Judge: *

In this case, we examine the requirement contained in the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution that “no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation . . .” (emphasis supplied) and its applicability to searches and seizures in the military services. This Court has previously held that information *198presented to the official who authorizes searches and seizures need not be under oath or affirmation. United States v. Penman, 16 U.S.C.M.A. 67, 36 C.M.R. 223 (1966); United States v. Hartsook, 15 U.S. C.M.A. 291, 35 C.M.R. 263…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. StuckeyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  2. United States v. RushingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  3. United States v. LandUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  4. United States v. FoustUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  5. United States v. PowellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API