Legal Opinion

State v. Schmidt

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 31, 1986No. 22511PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Justice:

Appellant Schmidt was convicted of criminal sexual conduct with a minor in the first degree and sentenced to thirty years in prison. He contends that the trial court’s limitation of his examination of witnesses and refusal to allow his proffer of testimony prevented fair trial. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

The minor child alleged that Schmidt made sexual advances toward her when she was six years old. Approximately two years elapsed between the alleged incident and the child’s first report of it. Prior to trial, the court granted the State’s motion to preclude any…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. State v. LynnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. RoperSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  4. Toole v. SalterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  5. Associate Management, Inc. v. E. D. Sauls Construction Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1983

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. State v. BellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  3. State v. SimsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  4. State v. TuckerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  5. State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API