State v. Schmidt
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Harwell, Justice:
Appellant Schmidt was convicted of criminal sexual conduct with a minor in the first degree and sentenced to thirty years in prison. He contends that the trial court’s limitation of his examination of witnesses and refusal to allow his proffer of testimony prevented fair trial. We reverse and remand for a new trial.
The minor child alleged that Schmidt made sexual advances toward her when she was six years old. Approximately two years elapsed between the alleged incident and the child’s first report of it. Prior to trial, the court granted the State’s motion to preclude any…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. LynnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
- State v. RoperSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
- Toole v. SalterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
- Associate Management, Inc. v. E. D. Sauls Construction Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
3Cited by38 opinions
- State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- State v. BellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
- State v. SimsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- State v. TuckerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.