Legal Opinion
Woodard v. Southern Casualty Insurance
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 25, 1974No. 4409PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PONDER, Judge.
Plaintiff has appealed the dismissal of his demands for workmen’s compensation benefits. We affirm.
R. A. Bennett, Jr., a defendant (Southern Casualty Insurance Company, the other defendant, is Bennett’s workmen’s compensation insurer) was a pulpwood dealer, selling, among others, to Boise Southern Company, which required that its dealers carry workmen’s compensation insurance. Plaintiff herein was a producer under Bennett. The working arrangement was somewhat as follows:
As Boise Southern needed pulpwood it would give purchase orders to the dealers from whom it purchased, Bennett…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Taylor v. Employers Mut. Liability Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
- Hart v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
- Hadnot v. Southern Casualty Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
- Bryant v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
- Bellard v. Tri-State Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Woodard v. Southern Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
- Bailey v. Southern Casualty InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
- Woodard v. Southern Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974