Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Bonham

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 19, 1993No. 10-91-03403; CA A72941Published

1DissentDurham, J.

I would affirm the trial court and, therefore, dissent.

The issue is whether the officer was authorized to request to search the truck. In addressing that issue, we are bound by the trial court’s findings and draw such inferences from those facts as are consistent with the trial court’s ultimate conclusion. Ball v. Gladden, 250 Or 485, 487, 443 P2d 621 (1968). Officer Ayres cited defendant, placed “zebra” stickers on the license plates,* 1 *returned an identification card *378and told him he could go. Ayres was in uniform and his car displayed blinking amber lights visible from the rear. He asked…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Brown v. Multnomah County District CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. CarterOregon Supreme Court · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API