Brumage v. Woodsmall
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
SNELL, Justice.
This is an interlocutory appeal by defendants Richard Woodsmall, John Williamson, John Mclsaac, and the State of Iowa from a district court order that overruled portions of their motion to dismiss. The portions of the motion to dismiss that were sustained by the court’s order have not been appealed by plaintiffs, Daryl and Peggy Brumage. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
The principles governing our review are as follows. A motion to dismiss is sustainable only when the pleadings make certain that the pleader has failed to state a claim on which any relief can be…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Clark v. MincksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Voss v. State, Iowa Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- Dickerson v. MertzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- Galland v. City of ClovisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Swanger v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
- Casteel v. VaadeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.