Legal Opinion
United States v. Edmond
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided February 28, 1995No. 93-1292; CMR No. 999PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
CRAWFORD, Judge:
1. Contrary to his pleas, appellant was convicted of being an accessory after the fact to attempted sodomy, 3 bad-check offenses, and committing an indecent act, in violation of Articles 78 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 878 and 934, respectively. The convening authority approved the sentence of a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 1 year, total forfeitures, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. The Court of Military Review1 affirmed the findings and the sentence. 37 MJ 787 (1993).
GRANTED ISSUE2
WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Strunk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. LovingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1994
- United States v. KossmanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. MizgalaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
- United States v. DotyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
- United States v. DiazNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
- United States v. NicholsUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
- United States v. DowtyNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.