Humane Society of the United States v. United States Postal Service
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES ROBERTSON, District Judge.
The Animal Welfare Act, 7 U.S.C. § 2156, makes it unlawful to use the United States mail to advertise an animal or certain sharp instruments for use in “animal fighting ventures.” The Postal Reorganization Act renders mail that is punishable under the Animal Welfare Act “nonmailable.” 39 U.S.C. § 3001. Invoking those statutes, the Humane Society of the United States petitioned the United States Postal Service (“USPS”) to declare nonmailable a monthly periodical entitled The Feathered Warrior. The Humane Society sought judicial review of USPS’s…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Nio v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- ORTEGA-LOPEZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2013
- Equal Rights Center v. Post Properties, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Humane Society of the United States v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Teton Historic Aviation Foundation v. United States Department of DefenseDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.