Legal Opinion

Hinkle v. United States

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided July 22, 2019No. 2:16-cv-00267Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT GREENEVILLE SHERISE HINKLE, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Nos. 2:15-CR-66-JRG-MCLC ) 2:16-CV-267-JRG UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Respondent. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Before the Court is Petitioner Sherise Hinkle’s pro se motion to vacate, set aside, or correct her sentence under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

[Doc. 1].1 The United States responded in opposition to Petitioner’s motion [Doc. 4]. Petitioner did not reply to the Government’s response. The Court finds the materials thus submitted, together with the record of the underlying criminal case,…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API