Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bower v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1999No. 25338Published

1DissentMaynard, Justice

(Filed Sept. 20, 1999)

I dissent in this case because I believe that West Virginia law dqes not permit an independent cause of action to recover future medical monitoring costs absent physical injury, and this Court has no authority to create such a cause of action.

Several things about this decision trouble me. The first is the way in which the majority goes beyond the narrow question presented by the District Court in order to decide this case. I do not dispute the Court’s authority under our Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act to reformulate a question submitted by a certifying…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. HuberWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Marlin v. Bill Rich Construction, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co. v. Pinnacle Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. State Ex Rel. Affiliated Construction Trades Foundation v. ViewegWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API