Legal Opinion

Goldston Corp. v. Hernandez

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided June 12, 1986No. 13-85-287-CVPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEERDEN, Justice.

Appellant challenges the damages awarded to appellee, its former employee, in a Jones Act case. 1 The trial court found appellant negligent in an incident which resulted in the amputation of appellee’s left great toe, and entered judgment for $150,-000. We affirm.

By its first point of error, appellant alleges that the court erred in making an award for future loss of earning capacity, claiming that the evidence was insufficient to apply federal law, which it alleges controls the damages. By its second point, appellant alleges that the court erred in awarding damages…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Glover v. Texas General Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Allied Finance Co. v. GarzaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co. v. McFerrinTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Hopson v. Gulf Oil Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1951

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Michael Jones and Harold Jones v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., and Shinn Fu of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  2. USX Corp. v. Salinas, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1991
  3. Tri-State Motor Transit Co. v. NicarCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  4. Bonilla v. Roberson, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1996
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Haney, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API