Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Graham v. Crow Wing County Board of Commissioners

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 19, 1994No. C1-93-1920Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKlaphake, Judge

I concur in part with and dissent in part from the majority’s opinion. I agree with the majority’s conclusion that the general declaratory judgment sought by the county attorney presents no justiciable controversy. I further agree that the Crow Wing County Board acted within its authority in employing Thomas Fitzpatrick to provide labor relations advice on and to negotiate union contracts with the county attorney staff.

The issue on which I depart with the majority is whether the Crow Wing County Board is entitled to summary judgment authorizing it to employ attorney Thomas Fitzpatrick to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Anoka County Airport Protest Committee v. Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  2. Keiver v. County of KoochichingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API