Legal Opinion

Hilliard v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 26, 1989No. A89A1937PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

Defendant Hilliard appeals his convictions of two counts of aggravated child molestation, one count of child molestation and the consecutive sentences imposed by the trial court. Held:

1. The trial court erred in imposing separate sentences for the two convictions of aggravated child molestation. The two charges were indistinguishable since all of the averments including date (which was not made an essential element), victim, and description of defendant’s conduct constituting the offense were identical. This lack of particularization permits the imposition of only…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  3. LaPan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  4. Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  5. Buice v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Frazier v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  2. Daniels v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  3. Hudson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  4. Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  5. Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API