Legal Opinion
Hemphill v. Johnson & Johnson
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 11, 2013No. Civil Action No. 12-279 (CKK)Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Presently before the Court is the Plaintiffs [20] Motion for Relief from Judgment. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b), the Plaintiff asks the Court to set aside the January 29, 2013 Memorandum Opinion and Order dismissing the Plaintiffs complaint for failure to state a claim. 1/29/13 Mem. Opin. & Order, ECF Nos. [16, 17]. For the reasons stated below, the Plaintiffs motion is DENIED.
The Court detailed the factual and procedural history of the Plaintiffs patent dispute with Johnson & Johnson in the January 29, 2013…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Hemphill v. McNeil-PPC, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2001
- Hemphill v. McNeil-PPC, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Hemphill v. Proctor & Gamble Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004