Legal Opinion

City of Hot Springs v. Creviston

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 3, 1986No. 85-237Published

1Opinion of the Court

705 S.W.2d 415 (1986)

288 Ark. 286

CITY OF HOT SPRINGS; Hot Springs Advertising & Tourist Promotion Commission; and First National Bank of Hot Springs, Appellants,

v.

Tom CREVISTON, Appellee.

No. 85-237.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

March 3, 1986.

Harkey, Walmsley, Belew & Blankenship, by John Norman Harkey, Batesville, for appellee.

Carl A. Crow, Jr., G. Latta Bachelor, III, Wootton, Glover, Sanders, Slagle, Parkerson & Hargraves by Richard Wootton & Robert Hargraves, Wood, Smith & Schnipper, by Ray S. Smith, Jr. & James W. Chesnutt, Hot Springs, Friday, Eldredge & Clark, Little Rock, by Hershel H.…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Hays; Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Hays.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. McArthur v. SmallwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  2. City of Hot Springs v. CrevistonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  3. Wayland v. SnappSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  4. Jernigan v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  5. Snodgrass v. PocahontasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API