Legal Opinion

State v. Otis

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 11, 2009No. 37705-5-IIPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn-Brintnall, J.

¶1 At a bench trial on stipulated facts, the trial court found Earl Gordon Otis, Jr., guilty of manufacturing marijuana, contrary to RCW 69.50.401(1). Otis appeals his conviction, arguing that the trial court erred when it granted the State’s motion to preclude him from asserting a medical marijuana caregiver affirmative defense — that Otis was legally growing marijuana as a caregiver for a qualifying patient under the Washington State Medical Use of Marijuana Act (Act), chapter 69.51A RCW. Because the trial court failed to enter written findings of fact and conclusions of law as required for…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. JanesWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Tunstall v. BergesonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Carson v. FineWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Weyerhaeuser Company v. TriWashington Supreme Court · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. AguirreWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. AguirreWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. ConstantineCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. State v. McCartyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. In the Matter of the Involuntary Treatment of: W.H.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API