Legal Opinion

Perry v. Green Mountain Mall

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided July 30, 2004No. 02-534PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Amestoy, CJ.

¶ 1. This appeal arises from a jury verdict apportioning more than 50% of the fault for a parking lot accident to plaintiff- appellant Sandra Perry. Appellant argues (1) the trial court’s dismissal of defendant-appellee Raymond Heath from the case was error because the court improperly concluded that Heath did not owe a duty of care to plaintiff-appellant pursuant to the Restatement (Second) of Torts §324A; and- (2) The error was not harmless. We agree with appellant’s first argument but not her second and therefore affirm.

¶2. Appellant was employed by the Ames department store at…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gazo v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  2. Brueckner v. Norwich UniversitySupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  3. In Re Appeals of Shantee Point, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  4. Derosia v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  5. Kostidis v. GENERAL CINEMA CORP., OF INDIANAIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. EBWS, LLC v. Britly Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  2. Meyncke v. MeynckeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  3. Langlois v. Town of ProctorSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  4. Smedberg v. Detlef's Custodial Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  5. McKinstry v. Fecteau Residential Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API