Legal Opinion · Dissent

John H. Smith v. Ford Motor Company

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 16, 1980No. 78-1636Published

1DissentWilliam E. Doyle, Circuit Judge

The sole issue which is relied on by the majority for reversal is whether an alleged trial error consisting of the giving of an incomplete or general statement as to the testimony of a proposed expert witness, in conjunction with the naming of the witness in the plaintiff’s pretrial statement, can justify the reversal of a judgment rendered following a lengthy and difficult trial and the award of a highly substantial verdict. There is not the slightest contention that the evidence is insufficient or that the claim is ill founded. Nor does it appear that the defendant made any effort by…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dicky D. Voegeli and Sharon Voegeli v. Harvard R. Lewis and Methodist Hospital, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  2. Shelak v. White Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. James Davis v. M. J. Duplantis, M.D., and W. Hammond Newman, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  4. Lillian Weiss v. Chrysler Motors Corporation and Chrysler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  5. Pamela Sue Rulo Sadowski v. Bombardier LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API