Legal Opinion

King v. McAnnally

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 28, 1937No. 4 Div. 917PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

In view of evident uncertainty in the minds of the bar and trial courts touching amendments to bills in equity allowable under present statutes, without working a departure from the original bill, this court in Garrett v. First National Bank of Montgomery, 233 Ala. 467, 172 So. 611, 617, reviewed our cases and laid down the following controlling principles : “An amendment does not depart from the purpose of the original bill if it seeks to adjudicate property rights in the same property between the same parties. This is the obvious effect of Code, § 6526. Amendments…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hall v. BrittonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. Garrett v. First Nat. Bank of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1937

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Long v. LaddSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
  2. Franklin v. NunnelleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  3. Ruffin v. CrowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  4. Holden v. HoldenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  5. King v. McAnnallySupreme Court of Alabama · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API