King v. McAnnally
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BOULDIN, Justice.
In view of evident uncertainty in the minds of the bar and trial courts touching amendments to bills in equity allowable under present statutes, without working a departure from the original bill, this court in Garrett v. First National Bank of Montgomery, 233 Ala. 467, 172 So. 611, 617, reviewed our cases and laid down the following controlling principles : “An amendment does not depart from the purpose of the original bill if it seeks to adjudicate property rights in the same property between the same parties. This is the obvious effect of Code, § 6526. Amendments…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hall v. BrittonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Garrett v. First Nat. Bank of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
3Cited by5 opinions
- Long v. LaddSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
- Franklin v. NunnelleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Ruffin v. CrowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Holden v. HoldenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- King v. McAnnallySupreme Court of Alabama · 1939