John Seiko Ginoza v. United States

HAMLEY, Circuit Judge.

John Seiko Ginoza appeals from his conviction on one count of a four-count indictment charging violations of the narcotics laws. 2 Seven errors, one consisting of three parts, are specified. We find specifications of error 1, 2, 8, 4, 5(a), 5(c), 6, and 7 to be without merit.

Under specification 5(b) appellant argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to strike testimony given by law enforcement officers concerning statements and admissions made by him after his arrest and prior to being taken before a committing magistrate. Contending that such statements…