Legal Opinion

Sculley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 1, 1998No. 96-3711PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In this direct criminal appeal, the public defender has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and appellant has elected not to file a brief in proper person, although afforded an opportunity to do so. We conclude that there is no reversible error affecting the judgment or length of sentence. Therefore, we affirm the conviction and sentence, except for the public defender fee imposed, because the trial court did not inform appellant of his right to a hearing to contest the amount thereof, before it imposed the lien. See, e.g.,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Neal v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  3. Holmes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  4. Mitchell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  5. Matke v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sculley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API