Legal Opinion

Kelstadt v. Reilly

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1878PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYah Bbuht, J.

The defendant in this action claims that the assignment, which is the foundation of the plaintiffs’ title to the fund in suit, did not transfer the title to the fund because it was made pursuant to the' insolvent laws of Ohio. Fortunately it is not necessary for us to discuss the question as to whether the laws of Ohio, under which this assignment was made, are insolvent laws or not. In the case of Meyer agt. Hellman (1 Otto, 496) the supreme' court of the United States referring to the statute of the state of Ohio used the following language: “ There is nothing in the act resembling an…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kelly v. . CrapoNew York Court of Appeals · 1871

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thompson v. FryNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  2. O'Neill v. NagleCity of New York Municipal Court · 1887
  3. Nassau Bank v. RitzingerNew York Supreme Court · 1886

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API