Legal Opinion

Stookey and Nelson v. Midland Flour Milling Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 24, 1943PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtShain, P. J.

The above two cases involve suits by two physicians against the owner of a flour milling company, operating under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The suits are for alleged medical services rendered by each physician to an employee of the milling company.

By agreement of all parties involved, the two cases are presented together, with understanding that the issues are identical and that one'opinion will suffice.

Under stipulations, but one question is presented for review, and that question is as to whether or not the Justice of Peace Court, in which the suits were originally brought, and the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Demay v. Liberty Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  2. McEneny v. S. S. Kresge Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  3. Morrow v. Orscheln Bros. and Hartford A. I. Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1941
  4. Dunnavant v. State Social Security CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1941
  5. Gronoway v. MarkhamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1938

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schopp v. MatlockMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API