Legal Opinion

Gronoway v. Markham

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 4, 1938PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtShain, P. J.

In this action the plaintiff seeks to recover from defendants for medical and surgical services to one Willard H. Perry, an employee of defendants. The plaintiff alleges that defendants employed him to do the service and agreed to pay therefore.

The following facts are shown as admitted, to-wit: That plaintiff is a regularly licensed physician; that defendants were partners engaged in business as contractors and bridge builders; Further, that Willard H. Perry was working as an employee of defendants and was acting under the direction of their foreman when he sustained an injury while lifting a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hunicke v. Meramec Quarry Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1914

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stookey and Nelson v. Midland Flour Milling Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API