Legal Opinion

Bell v. Wright

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1884PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from Wyandotte District Court. Action by Wright against Bell, to compel the specific performance of a contract for the sale of certain land situate in Wyandotte county. July 31, 1883, judgment was rendered for plaintiff. Defendant brings it here for review. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

This was an action to compel the specific performance of a contract for the sale of certain real estate *238situated in Wyandotte county. The contract of sale is embodied in a certain written instrument, which reads as follows:

“Article of agreement made and entered into this 21st day of February, 1880, between Simeon B. Bell, of the first part, and T. W. Wright, of the second part, witnesseth: That the said Simeon B. Bell, of the first part, rents, leases, and bargains to the party of the second part a certain tract of land described and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hagar v. BuckSupreme Court of Vermont · 1872

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Larsen Sheep Co. v. SjogrenWyoming Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Chadsey v. CondleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. SchrollSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  4. Harper v. HendricksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  5. White v. ImmenschuhSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API