Legal Opinion
Hamilton Manufacturing Co. v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided September 10, 1959No. 55-C-116PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TEHAN, Chief Judge.
This is an action brought pursuant to Title 49 U.S.C.A. § 20(11) as amended, by the consignee of an interstate shipment of steel sheets to recover for rust damage allegedly caused by the negligence of the defendant, a common carrier, which transported the steel from Indiana Harbor, Indiana, to Two Rivers, Wisconsin. The action against Inland Steel Company, the consignor, has heretofore been dismissed without prejudice by the plaintiff.
On or about February 11, 1954, the plaintiff ordered and purchased from Inland Steel Company, approximately 120,-000 pounds of sheet steel…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Thompson Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Secretary of Agriculture v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Jackson & Perkins Co. v. Mushroom Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Johnson Motor Transport v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Federated Department Stores, Inc., D/B/A Burdines v. Norman C. Brinke, Florida East Coast Railway Co., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- William A. Smith Contracting Co. v. Missouri Pacific RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
- Inland Waterways Shippers Ass'n v. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1960