Legal Opinion
Oxman v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 11, 1957No. Civ. 9313PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.
Appellant, who is the holder of an on-sale general liquor license, and operates a public restaurant and bar in Sacramento, commonly known as the Clayton Club, was charged with violating sections 25657, subdivision (b) and 24200.5, subdivision (b), of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act, sections 303 and 303a of the Penal Code, and rule 143, chapter I, title 4, of the California Administrative Code. He was found guilty of Counts III, IV, V and VII. Count VI was dismissed, and the hearing officer found that Counts I and II were not proved. As to Counts III, IV and V, his liquor license was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Boren v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Covert v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Thompson v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- People v. DeibertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Marcucci v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Harris v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- DeMartini v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Greenblatt v. MunroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Brodsky v. California State Board of PharmacyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Morell v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.