Legal Opinion
United States v. Schnick
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided October 24, 1986No. 86-5042-CV-C-5PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SCOTT 0. WRIGHT, Chief Judge.
The United States instituted this lawsuit in order to recover federal taxes, penalties and interest assessed against the defendants Howard K. Schnick and Michael W. Sadler for their operation of a book store. Additionally, the United States seeks to obtain a judgment against defendant Cowley Distributing, Inc. (“Cowley”) for these same taxes and assessments based on the sale of the bookstore by Schnick and Sadler to Cowley. All parties have moved for summary judgment for a variety of different factual and legal reasons. However, for the following reasons, the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Katchen v. LandySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Southmark Properties and St. Charles Avenue, Inc. v. The Charles House CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In the Matter of Met-L-Wood Corporation, Debtor. Appeal of Constantine John Gekas, Trustee. Constantine John Gekas, Trustee v. Frederick L. PipinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Magallanes v. Williams (In Re Magallanes)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Himmelspach v. Railcar Specialties, Inc. (In Re R.C.S. Engineered Products Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1994
- Shuman v. McDonald (In Re Shuman)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Milton H. Greene Archives, Inc. v. CMG Worldwide, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.