Legal Opinion
Toro Co. v. McCulloch Corp.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided May 10, 1995No. Civ. 3-94-664,PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KYLE, District Judge.
Introduction
Plaintiff The Toro Company (“Toro”) commenced this action against Defendants McCulloch Corporation and Shop-Vac Corporation (collectively “McCulloch”) alleging McCulloch infringed upon its patent for a portable power blower/vacuum (the “’528 patent”). McCulloch’s Answer and Counterclaim denied infringement and raised affirmative defenses of patent invalidity and un-enforceability. This matter is currently before the Court on McCulloch’s Motion for Summary Judgment on the issue of compliance with the marking requirements set forth in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Donna Krenik v. County of Le SueurCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. MacHholzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997