Legal Opinion · Dissent

New York Ass'n of Homes & Services for the Aging, Inc. v. Commissioner of New York State Department of Health

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 22, 1995Published

1Dissent

Crew III, J. (dissenting).

Simply stated, I am not persuaded that petitioners have met their heavy burden of demonstrating that the recalibration regulation " 'is so lacking in reason for its promulgation that it is essentially arbitrary’ ” (New York State Assn. of Counties v Axelrod, 78 NY2d 158, 166, quoting Matter of Marburg v Cole, 286 NY 202, 212). Indeed, my review of the record leads me to conclude that the subject regulation is entirely reasonable and, therefore, I respectfully dissent.

As noted in the majority opinion, respondents identified four factors responsible for the increase in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. New York State Ass'n of Counties v. AxelrodNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Matter of Marburg v. ColeNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  3. Consolation Nursing Home, Inc. v. Commissioner of New York State Department of HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Jewish Home & Infirmary of Rochester, New York, Inc. v. Commissioner of New York State Department of HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Del's Mini Deli, Inc. v. Commissioner of Taxation & FinanceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API