Legal Opinion

Keck v. Pickens

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 16, 1944No. 4-7421PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gírieein Smith, Chief Justice.

When in 1918 Pickens sold his farm to Keck, he retained a vendor’s lien securing $1,300 represented by Keck’s note due two years after date. An Indian — Fred Cox, alias James B. Burns —convinced Keck he owned lands near Oklahoma City. Keck, proprietor of a variety store at Bentonville (this State) traded his stock of goods and the so-called Pickens farm for the Oklahoma realty. After Cox (who immediately came to Bentonville) had disposed of a large portion of the Keck merchandise, Keck telegraphed from Oklahoma City that he had been defrauded. The difficulty was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hoggett v. EmersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  2. Field v. AdreonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1854
  3. Rock Island Plow Co. v. MastersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  4. McMorran v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Smith v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. LitteralMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Wife v. HusbandCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1970
  3. Eddie Medina, Jr. v. Gloria Tate D/B/A Humble Family Skate Center and Humble Family Skate Center, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013
  4. Eddie Medina, Jr. v. Gloria Tate D/B/A Humble Family Skate Center and Humble Family Skate Center, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API