Legal Opinion
Werner v. City of Albuquerque
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided March 27, 1951No. 5339PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COMPTON, Justice.
The appeal involves the validity of a tax title.
Appellants brought suit to quiet title, alleging fee simple ownership of the west half of Lots 1 to 3, inclusive, .of the Rosemont Addition to the City of Albuquerque. Appellees answered, denying appellants’ title and by affirmative defense charged fraud in the sale of the premises for taxes. By cross-complaint they assert ownership and seek to quiet title in themselves. The cause was tried to the court and from an adverse judgment appellants bring the cause here for review.
The evidentiary facts are substantially as follows: In…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Adams v. . GilligNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Scudder v. HartNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
- Laing v. McKeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
- Telman v. GallesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
- Frear v. RobertsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1947
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Chavez v. ChenowethNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
- Sauter v. St. Michael's CollegeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Unser v. UnserNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
- Pacific Royalty Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Pacific Royalty Company, a Corporation v. Carl H. Williams John W. Williams Mrs. John A. Cline, Jr. John A. Cline, Jr. Mrs. F. S. Hollebeke F. S. Hollebeke Paul Eugene Williams, Jr. Lottie May Treas Robert M. Treas Byron Leslie Williams Marvin Lester Williams Ruby Leona Williams Jessie R. Williams Edith Lillian Williams, Single, Who is Incompetent and Who Brings This Suit by Her Next Friend and Carl H. Williams, Johnstone Bates and William Rufus Bates, Cross v. Pacific Royalty Company, a Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.