Legal Opinion
United States v. Ohio Barge Lines, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 9, 1977No. Civ. A. 75-783PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROSENBERG, District Judge.
This matter is before me on motions filed by the defendants, Ohio Barge Lines, Inc. (Ohio Barge) and the M/V Steel Forwarder (Forwarder), a river going vessel owned by Ohio Barge, to dismiss the complaint filed against them by the United States pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure. The defendant Ohio Barge alleges that the plaintiff’s claim asserting a violation of § 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899, 33 U.S.C. § 403 fails to state a claim against it, while the defendant Forwarder alleges that the plaintiff’s claim of a violation…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Wyandotte Transportation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Rio Grande Dam & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
- United States v. Republic Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Graziani v. Committee on Legal EthicsSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- 1902 Atlantic Ltd. v. HudsonDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1983
- United States v. Ohio Barge Line, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WEST INDIES TRANSPORT, INC.; WIT EQUIPMENT CO., INC.; And W. JAMES OELSNER, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- United States v. W Indies Transp CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997